Idiot Nation

In "Idiot Nation", Michael Moore attacks the educational system of the United States, and points an accusing finger at government, media, and corporate America for their contribution to the apparent "stupidity" of our country.

I'll be honest: I absolutely do not like Michael Moore. As I began reading his article, I was extremely closed-minded and I found fault with much of what he was saying. As I pondered my reaction to his writing, I knew I would not be able to fully interpret or appreciate his point of view until I tried to read it with more of an open mind. As I made efforts to read his article more analytically, instead of emotionally, I actually found myself agreeing with some of his points.

I feel that Moore was correct when he stated, "Teachers are now the politicians' favorite punching bag."(139) The teachers my children have had have been wonderful, despite the system through which they are working. I think they have to put up with a lot of criticism and they really aren't paid what they are worth. I also agree that the government is largely responsible for the educational mess we are in; however, I disagree with his implied solution that all we need is more money to fix our problem. I feel that government-run programs, in general, are always inferior and less efficient than the private sector. If the government gave up some of it's control over the educational system of our country, I believe that the competition would provide a higher standard of learning, and teachers would be naturally compensated for their efforts.

I also agree, in part, with Moore's assessment of corporate America's hand in education. "Buying" a school so that it can widely distribute it's products does seem underhanded. "Two hundred and forty school districts in thirty-one states have sold exclusive rights to one of the big three soda companies...to push their products in schools." (144) This practice has had significant consequences on the health of our children, which is hardly compensation for the money the schools might be receiving. I do, however, feel that some of the programs, such as "Box Tops for Education" and "Labels for Education" are good programs that can help the school earn money for necessary school items. We have participated in these programs through my children's school, and I am happy to clip my box tops on products that I would buy anyway. I don't think marketing to students, in general, is "evil", but I do expect these companies to market responsibly and not harm my child in the process.

Finally, Michael Moore's tone throughout his essay almost screams his point of view at the reader. I guess the "shock factor" could be effective to an audience who agrees, for the most part, with his political views. However, I had a difficult time wanting to try and see his point of view, and I found myself becoming easily defensive. It's similar to the communication process. When someone is yelling at you, it's difficult to want to see that person's perspective; but when they are really trying to make a point without being demeaning and overbearing, you are more open-minded and willing to listen.